Lazarus High Risk Bybit Hacking Investigation [CLADIOUS-[BYBIT_HACKER_LAZARUS_ITER]-2025-001] - Wallet Analysis Report - Very High Risk - 0xe1b9...4910
Published
15 Jul 2025
22 views
Wallet Name
Analysis Target Wallet (CLADIOUS-[BYBIT_HACKER_LAZARUS_ITER]-2025-001) - 0xe1b9...4910
Overview
Project Scope
Analysis of wallet 0xe1b926a6cce516dc3a405c9b5bcfca29667c4910 - Lazarus High Risk Bybit Hacking Investigation
Suspicious Wallet Hash
0xe1b926a6cce516dc3a405c9b5bcfca29667c4910
This is the primary wallet address being investigated in this report.
Methodology
Research Methodology
Automated Analysis Methodology for Wallet 0xe1b926a6cce516dc3a405c9b5bcfca29667c4910
1. Data Collection
- Automated transaction retrieval from blockchain
- Historical transaction pattern analysis
- Network connection mapping
2. Analysis Algorithms
- Multi-algorithm approach using 4 detection methods
- Statistical anomaly detection
- Behavioral pattern analysis
- Network-based risk assessment
3. Risk Scoring
- Weighted risk factor calculation
- Multi-dimensional analysis
- Historical comparison baseline
- Real-time pattern detection
4. Report Generation
- Automated findings compilation
- Risk level determination
- Recommendation synthesis
- Compliance-ready documentation
Data Collection
Data Collection Process for 0xe1b926a6cce516dc3a405c9b5bcfca29667c4910
1. Blockchain Data Retrieval
- Retrieved 4 analysis data points
- Collected complete transaction history
- Gathered network connection data
2. Analysis Processing
- Applied multiple detection algorithms
- Performed statistical analysis
- Generated risk indicators
- Created behavioral profiles
3. Quality Assurance
- Data validation checks
- Algorithm consistency verification
- Result accuracy confirmation
Data Preprocessing
Data Preprocessing Steps:
1. Data Cleaning
- Removed duplicate transactions
- Standardized timestamp formats
- Validated transaction data integrity
2. Feature Engineering
- Created time-based features
- Calculated statistical metrics
- Generated network features
3. Normalization
- Applied consistent scaling
- Handled missing values
- Optimized for analysis algorithms
Design Pattern
No design pattern information is available for this report.
Analysis
General Analysis Summary for 0xe1b926a6cce516dc3a405c9b5bcfca29667c4910
Risk Level: Very High Risk Score: 100/100 Total Issues Identified: 16 Suspicious Transactions: 4
Key Findings: - Automated analysis detected 4 suspicious transactions - Risk assessment indicates very high risk level - 16 total suspicious patterns identified across all algorithms - Standardized risk score: 100/100
Analysis Confidence: High (automated multi-algorithm approach) Recommendation: Immediate investigation required
No suspicious patterns detected.
0xb058218c26040fe03955f9a93600763a083a92d311ca682459aa9887cf52ed81: Very short time between transactions
0xb058218c26040fe03955f9a93600763a083a92d311ca682459aa9887cf52ed81: Transaction amount halved compared to previous transaction
0xa9f83d87a80005ace253c4babecfa8f7dabc0985908fdbdfdb355e4c3864bc13: Transaction amount doubled compared to previous transaction
0xb058218c26040fe03955f9a93600763a083a92d311ca682459aa9887cf52ed81: High frequency transactions (less than 1 minute interval)
0xb16b0c3d0bc8a4c7df172271974c753bdcdd5b64c02a7a60f91c200b62e4b162: High frequency transactions (less than 1 minute interval), Regular interval transactions between the same wallets
0x9b28c328faddf33a733a5e58429a72cc39420dd5a90b859f1dd85b13cae8ee94: High frequency transactions (less than 1 minute interval)
0xa9f83d87a80005ace253c4babecfa8f7dabc0985908fdbdfdb355e4c3864bc13: High frequency transactions (less than 1 minute interval)
Summary
Total Suspicious Transactions
7
Average Risk Score
92.71
Top Tags
No tags
Suspicious Transactions
| Transaction Hash | Network | Risk Score | Risk Factors | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|---|
0x9b28c32…
|
— |
100
High
|
Repetitive transaction amount
Short time frame between transactions
High frequency transactions (less than 1 minute interval)
Outgoing structuring detected: 3 similar amounts totaling 0.00
Very short time between transactions
Transaction amount significantly lower than average
Part of suspicious wallet community
Low transaction fee
Related to 273 high-risk transactions (highest score: 100)
Sends funds to exploit address: 0x47666f...
Transaction involves DeFi exploit address: Bybit Exploiter 1
|
No tags
|
0xa9f83d8…
|
— |
100
High
|
Repetitive transaction amount
Short time frame between transactions
Outgoing structuring detected: 3 similar amounts totaling 0.00
Very short time between transactions
Transaction amount significantly lower than average
Part of suspicious wallet community
Low transaction fee
Related to 273 high-risk transactions (highest score: 100)
Sends funds to exploit address: 0x47666f...
Transaction involves DeFi exploit address: Bybit Exploiter 1
|
No tags
|
0xb16b0c3…
|
— |
100
High
|
Outgoing structuring detected: 3 similar amounts totaling 0.00
Transaction involves DeFi exploit address: Bybit Exploiter 1
Address became active after a long inactive period
Transaction amount significantly lower than average
Part of suspicious wallet community
Low transaction fee
Related to 273 high-risk transactions (highest score: 100)
Sends funds to exploit address: 0x47666f...
Transaction amount halved compared to previous transaction
|
No tags
|
0xb058218…
|
— |
49
Medium
|
High frequency transactions (less than 1 minute interval)
Related to 24 high-risk transactions (highest score: 97)
Very short time between transactions
Transaction amount significantly higher than average
Transaction amount significantly higher than user average
Part of suspicious wallet community
Anomaly detected by Isolation Forest
|
No tags
|
Showing 1 to 10 of 0 transactions
Advanced Analysis Findings
No Local Outlier Factor analysis data is available for this report.
No wallet community detection data is available for this report.
No transaction layering pattern data is available for this report.
No address clustering data is available for this report.
No sanctioned address connection data is available for this report.
Suspicious Activities
Suspicious Activities Summary:
High Risk Activities: 4
Medium Risk Activities: 0
Total Flagged Transactions: 4
Pattern Categories:
- Network-based anomalies
- Behavioral inconsistencies
- Statistical outliers
- Temporal irregularities
Automated Detection Results:
- Algorithm coverage: Comprehensive
- Detection confidence: High
- Risk classification: Validated
Conclusions & Recommendations
Conclusions
Analysis Conclusions for 0xe1b926a6cce516dc3a405c9b5bcfca29667c4910:
1. Risk Assessment
- Overall Risk Level: Very High
- Standardized Risk Score: 100/100
- Average Transaction Risk Score: 87.25
- Total Suspicious Patterns: 4
2. Key Findings
- Automated analysis completed successfully
- Multiple detection algorithms applied
- Comprehensive risk evaluation performed
- Standardized scoring methodology applied (score: 100/100)
3. Confidence Level
- Analysis Quality: High
- Data Coverage: Complete
- Algorithm Performance: Validated
4. Summary
The automated analysis has identified significant concerns.
Immediate action recommended.
Recommendations
Immediate Action Recommendations:
1. Priority Actions
- Escalate to compliance team immediately
- Implement enhanced monitoring
- Consider transaction restrictions
- Document all findings
2. Investigation Requirements
- Detailed transaction review required
- Source of funds investigation
- Enhanced due diligence protocols
- Regular monitoring updates
3. Compliance Measures
- File suspicious activity reports if required
- Implement know-your-customer procedures
- Apply enhanced monitoring protocols
- Document risk mitigation measures
Severity Assessment
Very High
Appendices & References
Appendices
Appendix A: Automated Analysis Results
Appendix B: Algorithm Details and Methodology
Appendix C: Risk Assessment Matrix
Appendix D: Transaction Pattern Analysis
Appendix E: Network Connection Analysis
Appendix F: Case Reference Documentation - CLADIOUS-[BYBIT_HACKER_LAZARUS_ITER]-2025-001
Appendix G: Investigation Team Notes - Cladious Forensics Team
References
1. Blockchain Analysis Framework - Cladious Platform
2. Risk Assessment Guidelines - Financial Action Task Force (FATF)
3. Automated Analysis Documentation - Internal Methodology
Report Information
Author
Cladious Auto
Published Date
July 15, 2025
Views
22
Likes
0