Lazarus High Risk Bybit Hacking Investigation [CLADIOUS-[BYBIT_HACKER_LAZARUS_ITER]-2025-001] - Wallet Analysis Report - Very High Risk - 0xcc56...2a61
Published
15 Jul 2025
47 views
Wallet Name
Analysis Target Wallet (CLADIOUS-[BYBIT_HACKER_LAZARUS_ITER]-2025-001) - 0xcc56...2a61
Overview
Project Scope
Analysis of wallet 0xcc56845e1933e3c20fc24eaed4c93b8818872a61 - Lazarus High Risk Bybit Hacking Investigation
Suspicious Wallet Hash
0xcc56845e1933e3c20fc24eaed4c93b8818872a61
This is the primary wallet address being investigated in this report.
Methodology
Research Methodology
Automated Analysis Methodology for Wallet 0xcc56845e1933e3c20fc24eaed4c93b8818872a61
1. Data Collection
- Automated transaction retrieval from blockchain
- Historical transaction pattern analysis
- Network connection mapping
2. Analysis Algorithms
- Multi-algorithm approach using 5 detection methods
- Statistical anomaly detection
- Behavioral pattern analysis
- Network-based risk assessment
3. Risk Scoring
- Weighted risk factor calculation
- Multi-dimensional analysis
- Historical comparison baseline
- Real-time pattern detection
4. Report Generation
- Automated findings compilation
- Risk level determination
- Recommendation synthesis
- Compliance-ready documentation
Data Collection
Data Collection Process for 0xcc56845e1933e3c20fc24eaed4c93b8818872a61
1. Blockchain Data Retrieval
- Retrieved 5 analysis data points
- Collected complete transaction history
- Gathered network connection data
2. Analysis Processing
- Applied multiple detection algorithms
- Performed statistical analysis
- Generated risk indicators
- Created behavioral profiles
3. Quality Assurance
- Data validation checks
- Algorithm consistency verification
- Result accuracy confirmation
Data Preprocessing
Data Preprocessing Steps:
1. Data Cleaning
- Removed duplicate transactions
- Standardized timestamp formats
- Validated transaction data integrity
2. Feature Engineering
- Created time-based features
- Calculated statistical metrics
- Generated network features
3. Normalization
- Applied consistent scaling
- Handled missing values
- Optimized for analysis algorithms
Design Pattern
No design pattern information is available for this report.
Analysis
General Analysis Summary for 0xcc56845e1933e3c20fc24eaed4c93b8818872a61
Risk Level: Very High Risk Score: 100/100 Total Issues Identified: 19 Suspicious Transactions: 5
Key Findings: - Automated analysis detected 5 suspicious transactions - Risk assessment indicates very high risk level - 19 total suspicious patterns identified across all algorithms - Standardized risk score: 100/100
Analysis Confidence: High (automated multi-algorithm approach) Recommendation: Immediate investigation required
No suspicious patterns detected.
0xb4bcd0300032e1380c4d718637e180e8e7b5fedaec7e0dc6c38caba7f2e45fbd: Very short time between transactions
0x73a502ee1e452d067d3dc0316b5e77bf7949cd592088ba34c683ee08580d6852: Very short time between transactions
0xea8b48137c8df3a5d981d2c8cf332248ae3fbb5903dd7b0db8d424aede4ec4b8: Very short time between transactions
0x72c87f7b5c5e181922b3f4beabc9d63bc064a8a27e3ad6d74665b7ebdea2aeb8: Very short time between transactions
0xea8b48137c8df3a5d981d2c8cf332248ae3fbb5903dd7b0db8d424aede4ec4b8: Transaction amount significantly lower than average, Transaction amount halved compared to previous transaction
0x72c87f7b5c5e181922b3f4beabc9d63bc064a8a27e3ad6d74665b7ebdea2aeb8: Transaction amount doubled compared to previous transaction
0xb4bcd0300032e1380c4d718637e180e8e7b5fedaec7e0dc6c38caba7f2e45fbd: High frequency transactions (less than 1 minute interval), Regular interval transactions between the same wallets
0x73a502ee1e452d067d3dc0316b5e77bf7949cd592088ba34c683ee08580d6852: High frequency transactions (less than 1 minute interval)
0xea8b48137c8df3a5d981d2c8cf332248ae3fbb5903dd7b0db8d424aede4ec4b8: High frequency transactions (less than 1 minute interval)
0x72c87f7b5c5e181922b3f4beabc9d63bc064a8a27e3ad6d74665b7ebdea2aeb8: High frequency transactions (less than 1 minute interval)
Summary
Total Suspicious Transactions
5
Average Risk Score
52.8
Top Tags
No tags
Suspicious Transactions
| Transaction Hash | Network | Risk Score | Risk Factors | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|---|
0x73a502e…
|
— |
85
High
|
Related to 16 high-risk transactions (highest score: 98)
Round amount consistent with mixer
Standard mixer amount detected
Part of suspicious wallet community
Short time frame between transactions
Large transaction amount
Transaction amount halved compared to previous transaction
|
No tags
|
0xb4bcd03…
|
— |
100
High
|
High frequency transactions (less than 1 minute interval)
Related to 126 high-risk transactions (highest score: 100)
Transaction involves DeFi exploit address: Bybit Exploiter 43
Very short time between transactions
Receives funds from exploit address: 0xe9bc55...
Transaction amount significantly higher than user average
Transaction amount significantly higher than average
Low transaction fee
Part of suspicious wallet community
Anomaly detected by Isolation Forest
Large transaction amount
|
No tags
|
0xea8b481…
|
— |
0
Low
|
Transaction involves trusted address (Exchange/DeFi Protocol)
|
No tags
|
0x72c87f7…
|
— |
40
Medium
|
High frequency transactions (less than 1 minute interval)
Short time frame between transactions
Related to high-risk transaction ['0x67a124e9d7a9b64317d76d8e5d13760e233a965a088cc8875d26ba3eda8b2e02'] (score: 100)
Very short time between transactions
Transaction amount significantly lower than average
Part of suspicious wallet community
Low transaction fee
Transaction amount doubled compared to previous transaction
|
No tags
|
0x422ea2f…
|
— |
39
Low
|
High frequency transactions (less than 1 minute interval)
Related to 16 high-risk transactions (highest score: 98)
Part of suspicious wallet community
Short time frame between transactions
Large transaction amount
Regular interval transactions between the same wallets
|
No tags
|
Showing 1 to 10 of 0 transactions
Advanced Analysis Findings
No Local Outlier Factor analysis data is available for this report.
No wallet community detection data is available for this report.
No transaction layering pattern data is available for this report.
No address clustering data is available for this report.
No sanctioned address connection data is available for this report.
Suspicious Activities
Suspicious Activities Summary:
High Risk Activities: 4
Medium Risk Activities: 0
Total Flagged Transactions: 5
Pattern Categories:
- Network-based anomalies
- Behavioral inconsistencies
- Statistical outliers
- Temporal irregularities
Automated Detection Results:
- Algorithm coverage: Comprehensive
- Detection confidence: High
- Risk classification: Validated
Conclusions & Recommendations
Conclusions
Analysis Conclusions for 0xcc56845e1933e3c20fc24eaed4c93b8818872a61:
1. Risk Assessment
- Overall Risk Level: Very High
- Standardized Risk Score: 100/100
- Average Transaction Risk Score: 52.80
- Total Suspicious Patterns: 5
2. Key Findings
- Automated analysis completed successfully
- Multiple detection algorithms applied
- Comprehensive risk evaluation performed
- Standardized scoring methodology applied (score: 100/100)
3. Confidence Level
- Analysis Quality: High
- Data Coverage: Complete
- Algorithm Performance: Validated
4. Summary
The automated analysis has identified significant concerns.
Immediate action recommended.
Recommendations
Immediate Action Recommendations:
1. Priority Actions
- Escalate to compliance team immediately
- Implement enhanced monitoring
- Consider transaction restrictions
- Document all findings
2. Investigation Requirements
- Detailed transaction review required
- Source of funds investigation
- Enhanced due diligence protocols
- Regular monitoring updates
3. Compliance Measures
- File suspicious activity reports if required
- Implement know-your-customer procedures
- Apply enhanced monitoring protocols
- Document risk mitigation measures
Severity Assessment
Very High
Appendices & References
Appendices
Appendix A: Automated Analysis Results
Appendix B: Algorithm Details and Methodology
Appendix C: Risk Assessment Matrix
Appendix D: Transaction Pattern Analysis
Appendix E: Network Connection Analysis
Appendix F: Case Reference Documentation - CLADIOUS-[BYBIT_HACKER_LAZARUS_ITER]-2025-001
Appendix G: Investigation Team Notes - Cladious Forensics Team
References
1. Blockchain Analysis Framework - Cladious Platform
2. Risk Assessment Guidelines - Financial Action Task Force (FATF)
3. Automated Analysis Documentation - Internal Methodology
Report Information
Author
Cladious Auto
Published Date
July 15, 2025
Views
47
Likes
0